NATO celebrated its 75th anniversary in April and held its annual leaders summit this week in Washington, DC. For 75 years, NATO has provided security and defense to more than one billion people on both sides of the Atlantic. Although the mood this week was largely jubilant, the showed the convening was more than an opportunity for commemoration, it served as an inflection point for the Alliance鈥檚 future and a call to action for maintaining support to Ukraine. Three main topics prevailed and indicate future trends for the Alliance: 1) support to Ukraine, 2) strengthening NATO鈥檚 deterrence and defense, 3) deepening partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region. With a new Ally鈥揝weden鈥損articipating for the first time, a renewed purpose and greater unity for the Alliance in light of Russia鈥檚 2022 invasion of Ukraine, at 75 NATO finds itself more indispensable than at any other point in its history.
More than a celebration
First, the Alliance celebrated numerous milestones and achievements. The Washington Summit was the first summit for Sweden as a full NATO Ally after officially joining the Alliance on March 7, 2024. Sweden and 贵颈苍濒补苍诲鈥檚 decision to join NATO was the single greatest consequence of Russia鈥檚 invasion of Ukraine in 2022; both are extremely capable Allies that amplify capabilities in Europe鈥檚 northern flank and more than double NATO鈥檚 border with Russia. Another cause for celebration is that a record 23 of 32 Allies are projected to hit the 2% of GDP threshold for spending. Allies agreed at the Wales Summit in 2014 to meet this minimum but it has been slow to materialize鈥搃n 2014 only 3 countries were spending 2% of their GDP. Since February 2022, European defense spending has by more than $80 billion overall. The fact that Europeans are spending more for their own defense than ever before and are providing in support of Ukraine鈥揳 narrative that has been slow to catch on in Washington鈥搘as made abundantly clear at the Washington Summit.
The fact that Europeans are spending more for their own defense than ever before and are providing more than the United States in support of Ukraine鈥揳 narrative that has been slow to catch on in Washington鈥搘as made abundantly clear at the Washington Summit.
The summit celebrated the origins of the Alliance, with President Biden鈥檚 speech on Tuesday launching the summit in the very place where the North Atlantic Treaty was originally signed in 1949. A highlight of the summit was the well-deserved praise for NATO鈥檚 outgoing Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg. His mandate has been unanimously extended four times, making him the second longest serving Secretary General in NATO鈥檚 history. He has guided the Alliance through a remarkable period of transformation across multiple US administrations, the pandemic, and Russia鈥檚 illegal invasion of Ukraine in 2022. This week was as much a celebration of NATO鈥檚 anniversary as for Secretary General Stoltenberg鈥檚 leadership: President Biden him with the Presidential Medal of Freedom; Secretary Austin the highest honor for non-US citizens from the Department of Defense; and Secretary General Stoltenberg the first pitch for the Washington Nationals baseball team. World leaders and top officials offered praise for his decade of service at every possible opportunity: the NATO Alliance is stronger, more capable, and more united than when he took over the helm in 2014.
NATO responds to current threats and foresees new challenges
Despite these achievements, there is still more to be done. The NATO Summit ironed out multiple deliverables to respond to the most challenging security environment since World War II. The Washington Summit Declaration largely echoed past NATO policy and talking points, with some notable new takeaways.
Since 2022 it has become clear that Europe鈥檚 defense industry is not capable of matching Russia鈥檚 output. Estonia鈥檚 defense minister Russia is spending between 7-9% of its GDP on its military. To that end, NATO a new Industrial Capacity Expansion Pledge to strengthen the Alliance鈥檚 defense industry, increase large scale and multinational procurement, and enhance supply chain resilience. Building on the Defence Production Action Plan agreed at the Vilnius Summit in 2023, the new pledge also enhances cooperation with NATO partners and Ukraine. The US in turn is doing its part, having $30 billion in defense manufacturing to restart or expand production across 35 states. With Russia capable of reconstituting its forces back to pre-2022 levels , Europe and North America are already behind where they need to be on defense production capabilities to respond to a resurgent Russia.
Russia has been and remains the most significant and direct threat to Allies鈥 security. The country was again singled out for 鈥渟hattering peace and security in Europe鈥 when it invaded Ukraine in 2014 and again in 2022. Its malign hybrid activities (in the Baltic Sea region in particular), led Allies to reaffirm in the Washington Summit Declaration this can lead to the triggering of . In what was perhaps omitted from the final version of the declaration, Poland鈥檚 Minister of Foreign Affairs, Radek Sikorski, to Russia as a multi-domain threat at the NATO Public Forum. A revanchist Russia remained the main focus of the summit, with little deviation from past NATO policy announced this week.
With Russia capable of reconstituting its forces back to pre-2022 levels within 5-7 years, Europe and North America are already behind where they need to be on defense production capabilities to respond to a resurgent Russia.
One marked difference regarding Russia, in a sign of the times, is that a greater portion of the Washington Summit Declaration focused on Russia鈥檚 allies and partners. The Democratic People鈥檚 Republic of Korea (DPRK) and Iran were both condemned for fuelling Russia鈥檚 war against Ukraine. Perhaps the strongest language was directed at China, which was described as 鈥渁 decisive enabler of Russia鈥檚 war against Ukraine through its so-called 鈥渘o limits鈥 partnership and its large-scale support for Russia鈥檚 defence industrial base.鈥 China was not featured as a concern in official NATO statements prior to 2019, but has increasingly been referred to as a 鈥渟ystemic challenge鈥 to Euro-Atlantic security due to China鈥檚 with Russia. The 32-nation Alliance鈥揳ll of whom had to agree to the language in the declaration鈥 unanimously condemned China鈥檚 support of Russia. Although China officially claims to not be selling weapons systems to Russia, it is still dual use material, computer chips, components, and advanced software that enables Russia鈥檚 war machine. In some of the harshest language in the declaration, the Alliance resoundingly states China 鈥渃annot enable the largest war in Europe in recent history without this negatively impacting its interests and reputation.鈥
China鈥檚 increased prominence in NATO statements has led the Alliance to its partnerships in the Indo-Pacific region. Since the 2022 summit in Madrid, the Asia-Pacific 4 (AP4)鈥揂ustralia, New Zealand, Japan, and South Korea鈥揾ave been invited to participate in NATO summit discussions. The Washington Summit Declaration makes it clear that the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific theaters are interlinked, with the security dynamics mutually affecting one another. The AP4 are increasingly selling weapons systems and technology to Europe to replenish depleted reserves, are supporting Ukraine in their own ways, and offering their expertise on cyber defense and countering disinformation. It is increasingly becoming clear that NATO will have a future, if yet defined, role in the Indo-Pacific.
Planning for long-term assistance for Ukraine
Heading into the Summit, Allies and commentators reluctantly adopted the official metaphor of a 鈥渂ridge鈥 for Ukraine鈥檚 entry into NATO. Described at various points throughout the summit by officials as a steel bridge, a bridge with lights, and a short bridge鈥搒ignifying the resolve, clarity, and brevity of Ukraine鈥檚 path to NATO membership鈥搕he 鈥渂ridge鈥 analogy quickly became synonymous with perceived inertia on full membership. However, despite little progress for Ukraine towards full membership, NATO leaders brought unprecedented measures for long-term support for Ukraine at the Washington Summit, outlined in the summit declaration in a standalone section. President Zelensky will not return to Kyiv emptyhanded.
As the NATO Summit began, President Biden to provide Ukraine with five new air defense systems. While this falls short of Zelensky鈥檚 for seven, this is still a major achievement for Ukraine, which sorely needs more air defense capabilities. This followed a by Russia on Monday, with missiles striking a children鈥檚 hospital and killing more than 40, a grim postcard from Putin as NATO Allies were preparing to meet in Washington. Additionally, an update on the deployment of F-16 fighter jets was provided by the White House, the transfer process is underway and the F-16s will be flying this summer. These American-made F-16s have been donated by the Dutch and Danish governments, with Denmark also providing training to Ukrainian fighter pilots. Belgium and Norway have also committed to providing additional aircraft. Before the summit began, Ukraine already had tangible deliverables, buoying spirits and talks.
In a marked shift, for the first time NATO announced in the Washington Summit Declaration it will directly coordinate financial support for Ukraine via the new NATO Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine (NSATU), pledging a minimum baseline funding of 鈧40 billion ($43.3 billion) within the next year. For the last two and a half years, NATO itself has been hesitant to be more directly involved in the conflict over concerns of bringing the Alliance into direct crossfire with Russia. NATO has sought more of an advocacy role but that appears to be changing. NATO will take on a more prominent role in the provision of military equipment, assistance, and training for Ukraine, including purchasing equipment, investments in Ukraine鈥檚 defense infrastructure and industry, and covering costs related to maintenance and logistics for military equipment. This is a major step towards making support for Ukraine consistent, efficient, and predictable.
In another positive sign towards Ukraine鈥檚 full membership, a swirling question of whether NATO intended to follow through on its promise to move forward with it began to gain momentum in the run-up to the summit. NATO allies made it that Ukraine鈥檚 path towards NATO membership was 鈥渋rreversible鈥 and therefore not up for debate in any potential future negotiations with Russia. Although no timeline for membership exists, this was an important symbolic gesture to assure Ukraine about its future in the NATO Alliance.
Ukraine is fighting on behalf of Europe and North America to defend freedom and democracy against Russia and prevent the spread of authoritarianism. NATO is fundamentally good for American security interests, as European security interests are intrinsically linked to US national security. Two World Wars taught Americans this lesson
As the US heads to vote on its next president this fall and world leaders gathered in Washington, there was an emphasis on making the case to the American public over the continued value of NATO. Poland鈥檚 Foreign Minister Sikurski directly pointed out at the NATO Public Forum, the US economy benefits greatly from weapons sales to Europe. Ukraine is fighting on behalf of Europe and North America to defend freedom and democracy against Russia and prevent the spread of authoritarianism. NATO is fundamentally good for American security interests, as European security interests are intrinsically linked to US national security. Two World Wars taught Americans this lesson and necessitated the creation of NATO. Then, 12 leaders met in April 1949 in the Mellon Auditorium in Washington with the goal of preventing further war in the Euro-Atlantic area. And in the 75 year history of the Alliance, NATO has by-and-large succeeded in preventing massive interstate war from returning to Europe. As NATO assembled leaders and top officials from its now 32 members鈥損lus partners from the Indo-Pacific, the European Union, and Ukraine鈥 for the 75 year anniversary of the Alliance, NATO has proven to stand the test of time.
Author

Global Europe Program
The Global Europe Program is focused on Europe鈥檚 capabilities, and how it engages on critical global issues. We investigate European approaches to critical global issues. We examine Europe鈥檚 relations with Russia and Eurasia, China and the Indo-Pacific, the Middle East and Africa. Our initiatives include 鈥淯kraine in Europe鈥濃攁n examination of what it will take to make Ukraine鈥檚 European future a reality. But we also examine the role of NATO, the European Union and the OSCE, Europe鈥檚 energy security, transatlantic trade disputes, and challenges to democracy. The Global Europe Program鈥檚 staff, scholars-in-residence, and Global Fellows participate in seminars, policy study groups, and international conferences to provide analytical recommendations to policy makers and the media. Read more
Explore More
Browse Insights & Analysis
Trump Speaks with Putin in Effort to End Russia-Ukraine War

From Partner to Ally: Sweden鈥檚 First Year in NATO

鈥淪ecurity, Europe!鈥: Poland's Rise as NATO's Defense Spending Leader
