A blog of the Indo-Pacific Program
We don鈥檛 know where鈥搊r in what conditions鈥揗ichael Kovrig and Michael Spavor are being held.
They were detained a week ago today, on Monday December 10, in different cities, in different regions of China, but on the same, serious allegations of 鈥渆ndangering national security.鈥
Both are Canadian citizens. Michael Kovrig is a former diplomat who now works for the International Crisis Group, an NGO focused on conflict resolution. Michael Spavor runs an organization that takes businesses and tourists into North Korea, and famously accompanied Dennis Rodman to meet .
Canada鈥檚 ambassador to China met Michael Kovrig on Friday, and Michael Spavor on Sunday, but no further details were released, and consular officials are pushing for further access.
The two men鈥檚 detention is clearly intended to send a message to the Canadian government over the arrest of Huawei executive on December 1 in Vancouver.
If any help was needed divining that message, China鈥檚 Global Times, a state-controlled newspaper known for its hardline nationalism, spelled it out, explaining the 鈥渓egitimacy鈥 of detaining the men, and how the situation, which is described as a 鈥済ame,鈥 could be resolved.
鈥淚t is quite simple to end the crisis between China and Canada by giving back Meng鈥檚 complete freedom,鈥 the said.
A further article in the Global Times the next day threatened to boycott Canadian businesses, for which some signs of trouble are already , and target its .
This is clearly being framed by the Chinese government, and its media outlets, as a high-stakes case of 鈥渢it-for-tat鈥 in which China is standing its ground.
Let us first retire the idea of any sort of equivalency. Meng Wanzhou was given immediate access to a lawyer, a timely and transparent court process, and has since been released on bail.
Chinese protestors, and indeed any others too, are free to demonstrate outside the courthouse, as are journalists to write about her case, and openly debate its merits across the U.S. media.
Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor are being held on suspicion of 鈥渘ational security鈥 crimes, which under Chinese law mean they can be held at a secret location, without access to legal counsel, for up to .
We know from previous cases what that detention can involve, with reports of repeated interrogation, sleep deprivation, and .
Now, let鈥檚 be clear about the actual message this is sending to the foreign companies, consultants, and analysts currently working in, or on China.
This is not just a ratcheting up of the difficulty of operating there鈥揻or businesses to consider whether their assets are protected, their capital outflow restricted, or how they can accommodate a Communist Party cell鈥搕his is now about the personal safety of their employees.
It can be somewhat of a journalistic clich茅 to say this sends a chill down the spine, but these threats are real.
As long as these men are detained, organizations active in China are recalibrating risk assessments, seeking advice, and reviewing travel plans.
On this 40th anniversary of 鈥搘hen Deng Xiaoping first declared that China would open up to the outside world and set the country on its trajectory to the global superpower we know today鈥搕he Communist Party of China (CCP) insists that it is still open for business. These actions suggest otherwise.
Of course, this must have been weighed at the highest levels of the CCP. The decision to arrest two Canadian citizens, particularly at a time when the country is embroiled in a trade war with the United States, and its economy is , would not have been taken without the consent of senior officials.
So that leaves us with two plausible explanations: either they underestimated the damage this would have do to China鈥檚 already deteriorating global image, or they decided it was worth doing anyway.
Perhaps the real message is that any attempt to thwart China鈥檚 technological ambitions, of which Huawei is an integral component, will be seen as a threat to national security鈥揳nd that will come first, no matter the consequences, reputational or economic, that follow.
And that should be even more worrying.
Author

Senior Editor of China and Global Affairs, the New Statesman
Indo-Pacific Program
The Indo-Pacific Program promotes policy debate and intellectual discussions on US interests in the Asia-Pacific as well as political, economic, security, and social issues relating to the world鈥檚 most populous and economically dynamic region. Read more
Kissinger Institute on China and the United States
The Kissinger Institute works to ensure that China policy serves American long-term interests and is founded in understanding of historical and cultural factors in bilateral relations and in accurate assessment of the aspirations of China鈥檚 government and people. Read more