乐鱼 体育

乐鱼 体育's Asia Program and Middle East Program present author Linda Robinson, senior international policy analyst at RAND and former 乐鱼 体育 Public Policy Scholar as she discusses her book, One Hundred Victories: Special Ops and the Future of American Warfare.

From the publisher: 鈥淩obinson has spent much of the last two years in Afghanistan studying the evolution of special ops in their largest and longest deployment since Vietnam鈥ncorporating on-the-ground reporting and interviews with key players inside the national defense community, Robinson shows how the special operations are becoming the future of U.S. military strategy.鈥�

鈥淔olks within the Special Operations community listen to Linda Robinson, and when they listen to her I listen to them鈥hen you listen to what she has to say and the power of her arguments, it鈥檚 hard to argue with her.鈥� 鈥擜dmiral William H. McRaven, commander of U.S. Special Operations Command

鈥淟inda Robinson is well-established as one of the leading experts on the U.S. military鈥obinson delivers a deeply reported, well-written account of the recent history of Special Forces and how they will likely shape the future of the U.S. military long into the future.鈥� 鈥擯eter Bergen, author of Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for bin Laden from 9/11 to Abbottabad

Selected Quotes

Linda Robinson

"The Special Operations community has been traditionally closed to outsiders, conducting their operations in secret. I worked and tried to persuade, and I think I鈥檝e been largely successful gaining the access to be on the ground, there was no way I could do this book without being out there with those small teams. And I know there were a lot of concerns about [whether] I interfere with the mission, I was certainly another additional security risk鈥� So I knew I represented a burden in that regard. I appreciated all the access, but to me, the only way I could write this account was the good, the bad, and the ugly. And there were plenty of things that were out there that didn鈥檛 work, that went wrong, and they鈥檙e all in the book. And I feel that it鈥檚 really important to try to give an unvarnished portrait. If they鈥檙e going to give the access, there鈥檚 no point in doing some kind of airbrushed portrait. It鈥檚 very important for people to understand what Special Ops can and can't do."

"The reason why I think [Special Operations is] going to be used much more despite their being [a] very small fraction of the overall U.S. military, [a] very small fraction of its overall budget, is the current defense strategic guidance really does call for the use of a small footprint approach to national security. And I think that鈥� technology enables these forces to go out and have an outsized impact, whether it鈥檚 a direct action mode or what I see increasingly, is this partnered mode鈥� So you do get to an endgame through a small footprint approach to security. It is not a panacea, it will not work everywhere, but I think the option that it represents is between a big war, which I do not see us engaging in frankly anywhere probably in my lifetime鈥� and the other pole is of course stay home and do nothing."

"There is this saying, if you have a hammer, then everything looks like a nail. So, I think this is a real injunction not to see Special Operations forces as a panacea for every conflict in the world. And indeed, I think the point is not to sprinkle Special Ops around like fairy dust. The current deployment is somewhere to 70 countries per year. And it seems to me it鈥檚 impossible to expect to have a lasting strategic level effect by that kind of employment of a small force. I think it鈥檚 much more important that the command focus on the key areas and figure out how they can have a truly鈥� enduring impact in those places where it matters to U.S. interest."