WEBCAST | Implementing USMCA: A Conversation with Luz Maria de la Mora, Mexico's Undersecretary for Foreign Trade
In mid-March, Canada ratified the USMCA trade deal, becoming the third and final country to ratify the deal that will replace the North American Free Trade Agreement. Now that the USMCA has been approved, a new chapter for North American trade is about to begin. While the official date has not been set, all three countries have begun taking important steps to be ready for implementation. There is still much work to be done on preparing the automotive rules of origin, and Mexico must also take steps to implement its major labor reforms. Additionally, some worry that the novel coronavirus outbreak could affect the implementation timeline, as industries work to navigate possible disruption to supply chains caused by the outbreak.
We were pleased to host a conversation by webcast with Mexico鈥檚 Undersecretary for Foreign Trade Luz Mar铆a de la Mora as she discussed what Mexico anticipates as the steps ahead to implement USMCA.
Selected Quotes
Undersecretary Luz Mar铆a de la Mora
鈥淲hat the agreement says is that USMCA will become effective, or will enter into effect, on the first day of the third month after the last notification was received. So, where we are right now in this ratification process is that the U.S. is still pending sending its notification to Canada and Mexico. Once that happens, then we can count the days.鈥
鈥淲hen we鈥檙e talking about uniform regulations, we鈥檙e not talking about negotiating anything new; we鈥檙e not talking about changing the percentage of regional content of any of the rules of origin that were negotiated. The uniform regulations鈥nd the reason why we are working on them is that they allow the final user of the rule of origin that will get the benefit of this preferential axis; they give them clarity鈥攚hat is the methodology that can be used to estimate the percentage of regional value counted?鈥
鈥淲e are working on the most important uniform regulations which have to do with the automotive sector. We understand the concern of the industry in the sense that the industry needs to know with clarity how to estimate this new value content. And that鈥檚 what we have been working with the USTR for quite some time鈥t was something important for us to be able to work trilaterally. This is something that we cannot do individually; this is something that has to be done at the trilateral level.鈥
鈥淔or Mexico, having USMCA in place and understanding what is the value of an agreement like this one, or any international trade agreement, has to do with one key word, which is 鈥榗ertainty鈥欌攌nowing鈥hat are the rules that producers in North America, investors, exporters will have to face. And I think that certainty, at this time of huge uncertainty, will be key for Mexico to be able to be a part of the North American value chain.鈥
鈥淲e do acknowledge that we do not have a perfect fit in terms of coordination. We have not been able to get the same sectors operating in the same way, but I think this is also a result of an emergency that we have never dealt with in the past. And this is something we need to learn for the future鈥攈ow do we coordinate, or how do we manage, to keep the health of the people as a priority and how can we manage to keep those regional value chains still in place?鈥
鈥淲ithout a question, I think that we need to look at infrastructure, we need to look at trade facilitation, we need to look at transportation, we need to look at customs facilities, border crossings鈥攁ll of the infrastructure aspects of trade: telecommunications, transportation, etc. However, we also acknowledge that probably the most important factor of competitiveness in the region will have to be our human talent, our talent pool.鈥
鈥淲ith this reallocation of resources from the U.S. which is quite substantive鈥 am quite positive, and I am quite optimistic that with implementation of USMCA the environment will get some more attention and also will be able to get the resources needed for its protection.鈥
鈥淲e at the Ministry of Economy, we are very aware about the practical challenges that this implementation will bring to the table. We have absolute understanding of what the industry is facing, and we鈥檙e willing to have a transition period specifically for the auto sector as it has been requested. And as I have mentioned, we have put this issue on the table many times but unfortunately, this is not a Mexican decision; this is a trilateral decision.鈥
鈥淲e do acknowledge that what we鈥檙e seeing with this pandemic, it may be a reassessment of global value chains, and it may also be the case that value chains may become more regional, since we understand that supply and demand have to be closer.鈥
鈥淭his is an agreement that intends to bring North America, the three countries鈥擬exico, the U.S. and Canada鈥攖ogether, so that we can remain competitive vis-脿-vis the rest of the world. So, for me, the challenge is how do I make sure that Mexico remains an essential part of that competitiveness equation.鈥
Keynote Speaker

Former Undersecretary for Foreign Trade, Secretariat of聽Economy, Mexico
Moderator

Former Career Ambassador to Afghanistan, Argentina, and Mexico;聽Distinguished Diplomat in Residence, School of International Service, American University
Hosted By
Mexico Institute
The Mexico Institute seeks to improve understanding, communication, and cooperation between Mexico and the United States by promoting original research, encouraging public discussion, and proposing policy options for enhancing the bilateral relationship. A binational Advisory Board, chaired by Luis T茅llez and Earl Anthony Wayne, oversees the work of the Mexico Institute. Read more